14,790
edits
Talk:Born Again (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→"Born Again"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::the clincher would come down to whether it got used in more than one reference work. the article probably needs a better title, anyway, like 2005 Children In Need Special, which a couple of CIN specials have come out with Whoniverse content. (obviously.) --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 16:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | :::the clincher would come down to whether it got used in more than one reference work. the article probably needs a better title, anyway, like 2005 Children In Need Special, which a couple of CIN specials have come out with Whoniverse content. (obviously.) --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 16:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::: As noted below, an attempt has been made to move the article, but there still is simply this one source giving this title, and we know from past experience BBC media is not always accurate, given how many wild and varied titles the Radio Times has given early Hartnell stories over the years. I'm still leaning towards trusting DWM on this since they have direct links to the production team -- heck, one of their main writers co-wrote The Writers Tale with RTD -- plus other sources, printed and website, have been using the Children in Need Special title. Until and unless we see more sources reflecting it, I personally see ''Born Again'' in the same light as ''Enemy Within'' or even ''100,000 BC''. If anyone is reading this from DWM, maybe they could get RTD to clarify the issue in one of his last columns? For now I say we keep using this title based on the fact that it is the title used by the BBC for the DVD release. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 14:44, September 26, 2009 (UTC) | :::: As noted below, an attempt has been made to move the article, but there still is simply this one source giving this title, and we know from past experience BBC media is not always accurate, given how many wild and varied titles the Radio Times has given early Hartnell stories over the years. I'm still leaning towards trusting DWM on this since they have direct links to the production team -- heck, one of their main writers co-wrote The Writers Tale with RTD -- plus other sources, printed and website, have been using the Children in Need Special title. Until and unless we see more sources reflecting it, I personally see ''Born Again'' in the same light as ''Enemy Within'' or even ''100,000 BC''. If anyone is reading this from DWM, maybe they could get RTD to clarify the issue in one of his last columns? For now I say we keep using this title based on the fact that it is the title used by the BBC for the DVD release. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 14:44, September 26, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::As an addendum, I also added a citation needed tag on "Regeneration Facts". Sounds like a rather naff title, even as a working title. Can anyone provide a source for where that came from? [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 02:27, September 29, 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Page move reverted== | ==Page move reverted== | ||
