Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
81,877
edits
Ben Moore812 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: We list all the other relatives of the Doctor as Time Lords, so I don’t see why their grandmothers should be an exception. Also, I’m sure Time Lords run in families, as in, relatives of Time Lords will be Time Lords. [[User:Ben Moore812|Ben Moore812]] [[User talk:Ben Moore812|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:35, December 2, 2018 (UTC) | : We list all the other relatives of the Doctor as Time Lords, so I don’t see why their grandmothers should be an exception. Also, I’m sure Time Lords run in families, as in, relatives of Time Lords will be Time Lords. [[User:Ben Moore812|Ben Moore812]] [[User talk:Ben Moore812|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:35, December 2, 2018 (UTC) | ||
::I agree that multiple sources ''do'' says Time Lords and Gallifreyans aren't interchangeable. As SOTO pointed out, we have IU proof that not all Gallifreyans are Time Lords, and that not all Time Lords are Gallifreyans ([[Ace]], for example). Doing something "wrong" for all other relatives doesn't mean we should persist on the error. It means we should go back and fix all the other "mistakes". Also unless we have a source for "relatives of Time Lords will be Time Lords", it becomes speculation, which isn't really a [[Tardis:Valid sources|valid source]], now, is it? All in all, I think we should take them off the "Time Lord" categories until such proof is given in a story. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:47, December 2, 2018 (UTC) |