Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Resolution: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Resolution (edit)
Revision as of 20:14, 5 January 2019
, 5 January 2019no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* If technology of the 9th century can disable a Dalek why is the Doctor so anxious about it being in the 21st? | * If technology of the 9th century can disable a Dalek why is the Doctor so anxious about it being in the 21st? | ||
::The Daleks are still a threatening menace to defeat + it's implied it took the combined forces of three empires to defeat it (given were told at least three nations were involved in taking it down.) Further, the Doctor appears more concerned with the Dalek contacting off-world Daleks to launch an invasion more than the threat the sole Dalek can produce. | ::The Daleks are still a threatening menace to defeat + it's implied it took the combined forces of three empires to defeat it (given were told at least three nations were involved in taking it down.) Further, the Doctor appears more concerned with the Dalek contacting off-world Daleks to launch an invasion more than the threat the sole Dalek can produce. | ||
:::And yet she taunts the dalek with being unable to prevail back in the 9th century and manages to disable it simply by running up to it and strapping on bits of a microwave. (Whereas soldiers and a tank stood no chance against it!) | |||
* Unit? Budget cuts? Really? Isn't Unit supposed to subject to the UN anyway? | * Unit? Budget cuts? Really? Isn't Unit supposed to subject to the UN anyway? | ||
::This doesn't really contravene continuity. Where has it been established that UNIT is exempt from such financial constraints? | ::This doesn't really contravene continuity. Where has it been established that UNIT is exempt from such financial constraints? | ||
