Talk:K9's Question Time (TV story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


== Invalid ==
== Invalid ==
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)
:I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
:I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
:::You know, I see this discussion never had a conclusion, and I'd very much like to see what part of [[Tardis:Valid sources]] rules out stories which happened to be released packaged inside a non-''Doctor Who''-branded show. As long as the story's officially released and makes sense on its own, why should we care in what context it was released?
:::There's [[Death Is the Only Answer (TV story)|precedent]] for shorts released in the middle of non-narrative TV specials, but presented as stories of their own which can be watched for their own sakes, to be valid. And wouldn't a rule of this sort, if extended to non-TV media, rule out short stories printed in non-''DW'' anthologies — i.e. ''[[Decalog 5: Wonders]]''.
:::It may, of course, be that ''K9's Question Time'' is invalid for other reasons, for all we know. Certainly, going by the title, it might well be fourth-wall-breaking in the mould of ''[[Search Out Space]]''. But I'm puzzled by the suggestion that “it was broadcast inside a non-DW show” is enough to declare it invalid, especially with the ''Children in Need'' precedent cited earlier. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:21, May 31, 2019 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,216

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.