Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Timelash: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
m (Refreshing page order)
Tag: apiedit
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
::That doesn't really seem out of character for the 6th Doctor. He could start telling her a story about Resurrection, then digress, or just cut himself off. Or he could just throw that fact in as an aside or even a total non-sequitur in a conversation. "Do humans ever invent time travel?" "Sure, Peri, but not until the 51st century. Other races got there much faster--the Daleks had time corridors less than 100 years after they went into space--but it took you humans 3000 years to even invent primitive time rings, and blah blah blah."
::That doesn't really seem out of character for the 6th Doctor. He could start telling her a story about Resurrection, then digress, or just cut himself off. Or he could just throw that fact in as an aside or even a total non-sequitur in a conversation. "Do humans ever invent time travel?" "Sure, Peri, but not until the 51st century. Other races got there much faster--the Daleks had time corridors less than 100 years after they went into space--but it took you humans 3000 years to even invent primitive time rings, and blah blah blah."


::If you recall, Peri does state she knows about Jo Grant. Also, [[Izzy Sinclair]] (one of the Eighth Doctor's companions in the Doctor Who Magazine comic strips) had read about the Daleks before she encountered them in the story [[Children of the Revolution (comic story)|Children of the Revolution]]. Peri also could've asked him about the Daleks after he mentioned them in [[The Mark of the Rani (TV story)|The Mark of the Rani]].


[[Category:DW TV discontinuity]]
[[Category:DW TV discontinuity]]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.