Talk:Series 5 (Doctor Who 2005)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 194: Line 194:
== Series 1 or 31 ==
== Series 1 or 31 ==
In DWM 417, Moffat apparently declares that it cannot at all be known as series 5, either 1 (first series for Smith) or 31 (overall). According to him, it doesn't count as the fifth series of anything and people who call it series 5 are wrong. So, will we acknowledge this or just keep it at five? If we do decide to change, I would argue that it'd be better to change 1 - 4 to 27 - 30 and also change this to 31. Because that's indisputable and not subject to the whims of the next production team. --[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 19:43, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
In DWM 417, Moffat apparently declares that it cannot at all be known as series 5, either 1 (first series for Smith) or 31 (overall). According to him, it doesn't count as the fifth series of anything and people who call it series 5 are wrong. So, will we acknowledge this or just keep it at five? If we do decide to change, I would argue that it'd be better to change 1 - 4 to 27 - 30 and also change this to 31. Because that's indisputable and not subject to the whims of the next production team. --[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 19:43, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
I agree RTD made a bit of a mess up and I think we should change all new series to their original number not there supposed new one. It's not going to make sense if all the series look like: Series 1 to 26, 1 to 4 and specials and then Series 31. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 20:37, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
1,358

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.