Talk:Series 5 (Doctor Who 2005)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Talk:Series 5 (Doctor Who 2005)/Archive 1 (edit)

68 bytes added , 18 January 2010

14,790

edits

@@ Line 203: / Line 203: @@
 :I don't get his logic. If it went by actor, Series 2-4 would be 1-3. It's perfectly natural to call it the fifth series since the revival, and calling it Series 1 opens up confusion with the recent Series 1, which could not itself be so easily confused with the original Season 1 because a different word is used, Series vs. Season. I think he should bow to the consensus on this one. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 03:40, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
-Two comments. First: don't blame RTD for this. The BBC made the decision not him. Second, whatever we end up doing, don't put in crap like "much to the annoyance of fans" unless you can cite chapter and verse of an article that says so. In the meantime, let's just wait and see what happens.[[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 00:37, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
+Two comments. First: don't blame RTD for this. The BBC made the decision not him. Second, whatever we end up doing, don't put in crap like "much to the annoyance of fans" unless you can cite chapter and verse of an article that says so (I just deleted this from the article and it makes us sound stupid). In the meantime, let's just wait and see what happens.[[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 00:37, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
 == Richard Curtis and a February start ==