Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,395
edits
Talk:How The Monk Got His Habit (short story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:How The Monk Got His Habit (short story) (edit)
Revision as of 12:58, 17 May 2020
, 17 May 2020no edit summary
DiSoRiEnTeD1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::::the tweetalongs are not "officially licensed" so i dont get what you mean. emily cook clarfieid this herself and said that the tweetalong / watch alongs are all her doing and onlt the official original stories are being licensed and signed off on by chibnall himself. so no, the entire tweetalong being licensed doesnt make any sense especilly with a number of representatives have "views their own" mentioned in their information section. | ::::the tweetalongs are not "officially licensed" so i dont get what you mean. emily cook clarfieid this herself and said that the tweetalong / watch alongs are all her doing and onlt the official original stories are being licensed and signed off on by chibnall himself. so no, the entire tweetalong being licensed doesnt make any sense especilly with a number of representatives have "views their own" mentioned in their information section. | ||
::::and no, im not suggesting hes infringing copyright becase i actually believe that the noveliation was planned and he did in fact post the first page of that as he stated. why do we have reason to doubt him??? [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ::::and no, im not suggesting hes infringing copyright becase i actually believe that the noveliation was planned and he did in fact post the first page of that as he stated. why do we have reason to doubt him??? [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ||
:::::Because [[Doctor Who and the Time War (short story)|there]] were [[Revenge of the Nestene (short story)|three]] other [[Dalek alternative script extract (short story)|instances]] in ''Lockdown!'' of a story being released under the banner of being an extract from a project than never was, and in all those cases, it was clearly good-natured fibbing that was just meant to make the experience more fun. | |||
:::::Cook may have stated that the Tweetalongs weren't a ''[[Doctor Who Magazine]]''-endorsed project ''per se'', but clearly some sort of agreement exists with the BBC, since some of the stories were released on the official ''Doctor Who'' YouTube channel or the BBC website, with no specific logic to which ones (one chapter of [[Paul Cornell]]'s "Shadow" trilogy was released on the BBC website, then the other two were released on the ''Lockdown'' YouTube channel). Unless told otherwise, we have wisely been assuming that all the ''Lockdown''-original stories and documentaries are being released under this agreement. | |||
:::::One way or another, Peter Harness released a page of fully-written out DWU fiction on [[11 April (releases)|11 April]] [[2020 (releases)|2020]]. Whenever and however it came to be written, it exists. The only reason it plausibly shouldn't be covered on the Wiki in some shape or form is if Harness didn't have the legal right to publish that page. | |||
:::::Assuming we continue to cover it, then ''if'' we make a lot of assumptions it ''might'' be an ''invalid'' short story for similar reasons to ''[[P.S. (webcast)|P.S.]]''. But I see little reason to make such assumptions. The three precedents within ''Lockdown!'' were clearly not genuine excerpts from old material. And even if a novelisation was for some insane reason begun in 2015, Harness deciding to release this specific scene in 2020 could still count as a separate short story release, unless it were proven that Harness doesn't think this scene can stand up as its own event in the DWU.--[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:58, May 17, 2020 (UTC) | |||
