Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,395
edits
DiSoRiEnTeD1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::::both strax / incoming were promoted by emily cook! thats the whole thing, the lockdown is her organisation. she plans all the official material, and chibnall signs off on it. she had nothing to do with this story whatsoever. it is the only one on the entire list that she hasnt acknowledge at all, because it was not planned - it was a spur of the moment post by harness after his tweetalong ended when fans begged to hear more about his unproduced story. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, May 17, 2020 (UTC) | :::::both strax / incoming were promoted by emily cook! thats the whole thing, the lockdown is her organisation. she plans all the official material, and chibnall signs off on it. she had nothing to do with this story whatsoever. it is the only one on the entire list that she hasnt acknowledge at all, because it was not planned - it was a spur of the moment post by harness after his tweetalong ended when fans begged to hear more about his unproduced story. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, May 17, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::someone should pose the question during the lockdown watchalong tonight. but im pretty sure what the answer will be, this story had nothing to do with locdown. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ::::::someone should pose the question during the lockdown watchalong tonight. but im pretty sure what the answer will be, this story had nothing to do with locdown. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ||
::::::someone should pose the question during the lockdown watchalong tonight. but im pretty sure what the answer will be, this story had nothing to do with locdown. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | |||
::::You've got me all wrong if you think I'm saying [[Peter Harness]] was ''lying'' about his having actually planned the novel. I think he claimed to have planned the novel in 2015 as a self-evidently outrageous metafictional framing for his new short story — no different from the framing of ''[[The Thief of Sherwood (short story)|The Thief of Sherwood]]'' being framed as scavenged material of a lost Hartnell serial. There's no lying because the readers aren't supposed to believe for one moment that the improbable 2015 novelisation ever existed. | |||
:::Either way, though, you haven't addressed my point. What does it change if the page is indeed an extract from a 2015 draft? If, as you claim, Harness was no longer permitted to release new DWU thing as part of his Tweetalong by this point — then why would it make any difference whether the DWU thing had been written in 2015 or 2020? He'd still be infringing the BBC's copyright by publishing it. Either Harness had the right to publish prose with the Monk on 11 April 2020, or he did not ("[[Genesis of the Daleks (TV story)|does he have the right?]]"); the exact nature of the prose with the Monk isn't the point in this instance. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:41, May 17, 2020 (UTC) |