662
edits
No edit summary |
DiSoRiEnTeD1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
::::it is your burden to prove that it is part of lockdown. it was never ackowledged by the official lockdown representatives apart from emily cook distancing herself from it, so you can ask her yorself or find other inforation to prove that it is. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ::::it is your burden to prove that it is part of lockdown. it was never ackowledged by the official lockdown representatives apart from emily cook distancing herself from it, so you can ask her yorself or find other inforation to prove that it is. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ||
:::::I'm not talking about it being part of ''Lockdown!'' at this point, I'm talking about whether it was licensed. It could be outside ''Lockdown'' yet licensed — so was ''[[United we stand, 2m apart (webcast)|United we stand, 2m apart]]'', wasn't it? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:14, May 17, 2020 (UTC) | :::::I'm not talking about it being part of ''Lockdown!'' at this point, I'm talking about whether it was licensed. It could be outside ''Lockdown'' yet licensed — so was ''[[United we stand, 2m apart (webcast)|United we stand, 2m apart]]'', wasn't it? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:14, May 17, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::again, seems like your burden to prove. but i very much doubt youll find anything, it was clearly presnted as just an unpublished story which probably never got to the licensing stage. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] |
edits