Forum:Early 2010 dissatisfaction with Discontinuity sections: Difference between revisions

Forum:Early 2010 dissatisfaction with Discontinuity sections (edit)

403 bytes added , 29 January 2010

no edit summary

33,205

edits

Revision as of 23:40, 28 January 2010 (edit) Lottie01 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:58, 29 January 2010 (edit) (undo) Mini-mitch (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	I think they should be kept but regularly reviewed as some people are just picking holes, i like them though because they answer some of my questions about continuity. --lottie01 23:40, January 28, 2010 (UTC)		I think they should be kept but regularly reviewed as some people are just picking holes, i like them though because they answer some of my questions about continuity. --lottie01 23:40, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

			:I think that the discontinuity section for all stories should be reviewed and all unrelevant stuff in the section should be deleted and only the relevant stuff should be kept (MAJOUR plotholes and errors etc). And instead of the section being called 'Discontinuity, plotholes and errors' it should be changed to either 'Errors' and 'Discontinuity and Errors'' Mini-mitch 15:58, January 29, 2010 (UTC)