5,178
edits
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::How complex is the procedure to decide on a new prefix? It would make more sense to come up with a new prefix now (I would favour DWST, but that's by-the-by) than to have to go back and laboriously change every instance of a referenced Short Trip at a future point (at least one Short Trip prose story is referred to on the wiki with a BFA prefix already). [[User:Gai-jin|Gai-jin]] 15:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ::How complex is the procedure to decide on a new prefix? It would make more sense to come up with a new prefix now (I would favour DWST, but that's by-the-by) than to have to go back and laboriously change every instance of a referenced Short Trip at a future point (at least one Short Trip prose story is referred to on the wiki with a BFA prefix already). [[User:Gai-jin|Gai-jin]] 15:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
::you'd have to go and change the prefixes individually. | :::you'd have to go and change the prefixes individually. | ||
:as far as the prefix, I would just go with ST myself, as the DW would seem somewhat redundant. (as far as me making up a Doctor Who Annual prefix, I did that to distinguish between that and Dalek Annuals and the one K-9 Annual.) --[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 15:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | :::as far as the prefix, we have done that on the fly with no set procedure. I would just go with ST myself, as the DW would seem somewhat redundant. (as far as me making up a Doctor Who Annual prefix, I did that to distinguish between that and Dalek Annuals and the one K-9 Annual.) --[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 15:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC) |
edits