Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
81,877
edits
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
So I have created a new Category recently, entitled [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Possibly_Non-canonical_stories Possibly Non-canonical stories]. It was created for stories that are possibly non-cannon, because they cantradict other stories, or break a wall that seperates the Real world (where you and I are) and the Doctor Who world. (for instance, I dobt that there is a single whovian out there that has doubted than Cannonicity of the [[John and Gillian]] comics.) I have been informed, however, that before this idea is passed, that I need to talk it over with the group, and that those in higher power do not approve. [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] <sup>[[User talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me]]</sup> 17:24, October 12, 2011 (UTC) | So I have created a new Category recently, entitled [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Possibly_Non-canonical_stories Possibly Non-canonical stories]. It was created for stories that are possibly non-cannon, because they cantradict other stories, or break a wall that seperates the Real world (where you and I are) and the Doctor Who world. (for instance, I dobt that there is a single whovian out there that has doubted than Cannonicity of the [[John Who|John]] and [[Gillian Who|Gillian]] comics.) I have been informed, however, that before this idea is passed, that I need to talk it over with the group, and that those in higher power do not approve. [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] <sup>[[User talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me]]</sup> 17:24, October 12, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:For the record, I deleted the category as it's something of a big change to claim that all these stories are "possibly non-canonical". Furthermore, I did not sat that "those in higher power do not approve" - my exact words were "I for one am strongly against the idea". I just think this comes down to personal opinion and you can't really profess to be an encyclopaedia if you pick and choose the bits that make sense.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:28, October 12, 2011 (UTC) | :For the record, I deleted the category as it's something of a big change to claim that all these stories are "possibly non-canonical". Furthermore, I did not sat that "those in higher power do not approve" - my exact words were "I for one am strongly against the idea". I just think this comes down to personal opinion and you can't really profess to be an encyclopaedia if you pick and choose the bits that make sense.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:28, October 12, 2011 (UTC) |