Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!: Difference between revisions

Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown! (edit)

488 bytes added , 5 November 2020

no edit summary

Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators

38,362

edits

Revision as of 18:08, 5 November 2020 (edit) DiSoRiEnTeD1 (talk \| contribs) (→‎New Evidence re Lockdown stories) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:25, 5 November 2020 (edit) (undo) Scrooge MacDuck (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 581:		Line 581:

	::: Actually I pointed out that she also used the hashtag on several fan videos - therefore the hashtag alone isn’t enough to confirm the story’s involvement with Doctor Who: Lockdown! [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1\|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:08, November 5, 2020 (UTC)		::: Actually I pointed out that she also used the hashtag on several fan videos - therefore the hashtag alone isn’t enough to confirm the story’s involvement with Doctor Who: Lockdown! [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1\|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:08, November 5, 2020 (UTC)
			:::: And as we already said ''then'', all this proves is that unlicensed fan productions can be part of ''Lockdown!'' too. Which is also what Cook has always promoted as the essence of ''Lockdown!'': fan engagement. Just because we don't ''cover'' those productions, doesn't mean they're not part of ''Lockdown!'' just as much as the licensed ones. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck\|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:25, November 5, 2020 (UTC)