Talk:Could've Been King: Difference between revisions

Talk:Could've Been King (edit)

326 bytes added , 27 February 2010

no edit summary

604

edits

Revision as of 19:19, 27 February 2010 (edit) 97.126.173.92 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:41, 27 February 2010 (edit) (undo) Excalibur-117 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	He mentions Could've Been King and his army of meanwas and neverweres. The Nightmare Child is a different entity all together. It seems in the time war, time was used to resurrect millions of beings that died in the war, and whomever was behind it was finding new ways to destroy them. I've heard talks of a time war movie with Eccelston and Tennent. That should be interesting. Not sure if it's just rumor or a reality. - Chad Ippolito. Feb 27 2010		He mentions Could've Been King and his army of meanwas and neverweres. The Nightmare Child is a different entity all together. It seems in the time war, time was used to resurrect millions of beings that died in the war, and whomever was behind it was finding new ways to destroy them. I've heard talks of a time war movie with Eccelston and Tennent. That should be interesting. Not sure if it's just rumor or a reality. - Chad Ippolito. Feb 27 2010

			The Time War movie thing barely constitutes a rumor, it's just someone seen a youtube video and thought it was real or something ( But thats off topic). Personally, I feel that the Could've Been King is a similar entity to the Faction Paradox and the like. [[User:Excalibur-117\|Excalibur-117]] 20:41, February 27, 2010 (UTC)