Trusted
44,457
edits
Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 827: | Line 827: | ||
:(Once again: the above is a suggestion, not a ruling. You're going to need another admin to vouch off on these deletions, or on any retentions; I am ''not habilitated'' to make this ruling.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | :(Once again: the above is a suggestion, not a ruling. You're going to need another admin to vouch off on these deletions, or on any retentions; I am ''not habilitated'' to make this ruling.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: I'm probably against everything except ''A Better World'' being validated. Forgive me if I'm misremembering because there are no forums right now to double check but I recall a thread for two stories in ''[[The Dalek Outer Space Book]]'' which did not feature any DWU elements. Their validity remained because the publication had the licence to use the Daleks but just ''chose'' not to. If ''The Fan Gallery'' stories did not have the licence to use BBC elements in the first place, that choice is not there. ''A Better World'' is seperated from this particular issue because it does have the licence to a DWU character, namely Auteur. | |||
:: It might be an option to cover the other non-rule 2 failers as invalid but I would prefer if all ''The Fan Gallery'' stories are instead listed on the ''Lockdown!'' page with external links to the ''Lockdown!'' Wiki where they can be covered in full. [[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
