Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,198
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:[[User:Najawin]] would have been correct as of just a few weeks ago that the policy-as-written conflicted with the practice across the Wiki of creating pages for in-universe counterparts of various individuals — not that it started with [[User:Epsilon the Eternal]]'s more recent efforts; we've had [[Tom Baker (TV Action!)]] for a very long time. | :[[User:Najawin]] would have been correct as of just a few weeks ago that the policy-as-written conflicted with the practice across the Wiki of creating pages for in-universe counterparts of various individuals — not that it started with [[User:Epsilon the Eternal]]'s more recent efforts; we've had [[Tom Baker (TV Action!)]] for a very long time. | ||
:However, [[User:Shambala108]]'s helpful comments at [[Talk:Hugh Grant]] spelled out the "common practice" (in the sense of "unwritten policy") around the ''naming'' of in-universe counterparts to BTS personalities. This carried an implicit endorsement of the existence of such, and this is doubly the case since Shambala's words on that talk page have been incorporated in the "Primary topics" section of the actual [[T:DAB]] policy page. | :However, [[User:Shambala108]]'s helpful comments at [[Talk:Hugh Grant]] spelled out the "common practice" (in the sense of "unwritten policy") around the ''naming'' of in-universe counterparts to BTS personalities. This carried an implicit endorsement of the existence of such, and this is doubly the case since Shambala's words on that talk page have been incorporated in the "Primary topics" section of the actual [[T:DAB]] policy page. Which only makes sense — conflating the mentioned "from the real-world" DWU individuals with their real-world counterparts chafed with [[T:NO RW]] quite a bit. | ||
:'''This page — and its ilk — can stay''', although until very recently they ''technically'' shouldn't have, maybe, sort of, depending on how you read precedent. | :'''This page — and its ilk — can stay''', although until very recently they ''technically'' shouldn't have, maybe, sort of, depending on how you read precedent. | ||
:And thanks for the kind words, Najawin! [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC) | :And thanks for the kind words, Najawin! [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
:P.S.: [[User:SOTO]]'s complaint about Hurt only being ''mentioned'' in ''[[Greeks Bearing Gifts (TV story)|Greeks Bearing Gifts]]'' does however hold up; we're not really supposed to dab by mention. Any thoughts on an alternative dab term? "(actor)" might be confusing; how do we feel about "(N-Space)"? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
::P.S.: [[User:SOTO]]'s earlier complaint, from last June, about Hurt only being ''mentioned'' in ''[[Greeks Bearing Gifts (TV story)|Greeks Bearing Gifts]]'' does however hold up; we're not really supposed to dab by mention. Any thoughts on an alternative dab term? "(actor)" might be confusing; how do we feel about "(N-Space)"? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |