604
edits
Talk:Could've Been King: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Could've Been King Entry Should Be Deleted
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Please note the very deliberate and precise use of the semicolon punctuation between the Skaros Degradations and the Horde of Travesties that indicates they are separate entities and the switch to a comma after the Nightmare Child that shows the Doctor was referring the Nightmare Child as the would-be king. This can be verified by watching a DVD or Blu-ray copy of this episode with subtitles. In short, this entry for the Could've Been King should be deleted and the related entries updated to reflect that the Doctor was referring to the Nightmare Child.[[Special:Contributions/67.247.26.212|67.247.26.212]] 04:11, March 7, 2010 (UTC)Peter Lee | Please note the very deliberate and precise use of the semicolon punctuation between the Skaros Degradations and the Horde of Travesties that indicates they are separate entities and the switch to a comma after the Nightmare Child that shows the Doctor was referring the Nightmare Child as the would-be king. This can be verified by watching a DVD or Blu-ray copy of this episode with subtitles. In short, this entry for the Could've Been King should be deleted and the related entries updated to reflect that the Doctor was referring to the Nightmare Child.[[Special:Contributions/67.247.26.212|67.247.26.212]] 04:11, March 7, 2010 (UTC)Peter Lee | ||
Actually, He quite clearly says THE Could've Been King. [[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 11:08, March 14, 2010 (UTC) | |||
