Talk:Vienna Salvatori: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 24: Line 24:


::Having just listened to ''The Memory Box'' (available free from Big Finish this week), I am surprised by the idea that Vienna the series was meant to be non-DWU. There are the [[Slithergee]] and references to aspects of the Monthly Adventure trilogy she debuted in ([[Kylo Sorsha|Kylo]] & [[Aliona]], the [[Wrath]] Empire). If the behind the scenes intent was that she was not part of the DWU, why bother including these aspects? Also worth noting is that Big Finish included the trailer for ''Master!'' with the free giveaway of ''The Memory Box'', which certainly suggests that Vienna in both of these releases is intended by Big Finish to be one and the same. I think reconsideration would be worthwhile here. [[User:SherlockTheII|SherlockTheII]] [[User talk:SherlockTheII|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
::Having just listened to ''The Memory Box'' (available free from Big Finish this week), I am surprised by the idea that Vienna the series was meant to be non-DWU. There are the [[Slithergee]] and references to aspects of the Monthly Adventure trilogy she debuted in ([[Kylo Sorsha|Kylo]] & [[Aliona]], the [[Wrath]] Empire). If the behind the scenes intent was that she was not part of the DWU, why bother including these aspects? Also worth noting is that Big Finish included the trailer for ''Master!'' with the free giveaway of ''The Memory Box'', which certainly suggests that Vienna in both of these releases is intended by Big Finish to be one and the same. I think reconsideration would be worthwhile here. [[User:SherlockTheII|SherlockTheII]] [[User talk:SherlockTheII|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
:::: It would. In fact, it '''definitely''' would. There can be no plausible cause not to cover the ''Vienna'' series on the Wiki after all this. At the ''very'' least, even if we still insist that this fails [[Tardis:Valid sources|Rule 4]], then we should still have {{tl|invalid}} pages on it, much as we do about the likes of ''[[Death Comes to Time (webcast)|Death Comes to Time]]''.
:::: This is really the sort of thing that make one feel the ache of a lack of Forum very acutely, because although the thread would be a shoe-in, we do, by protocol, '''need''' a thread to revalidate ''Vienna''. One very much ''wants'' to waive protocol in this particular juncture, but… I'm not comfortable doing so myself. If other admins agree with me, perhaps.
:::: Thoughts, everyone? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,419

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.