Talk:List of unproduced stories: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 37: Line 37:
To add to this discussion just a little... since it is about defining the scope of this page: I would like to readily note that the Leekley Bible items - bar Fathers and Brothers - would likely not fit the notion that is being laid out, given that they seem not to have actually been '''pitched at all'''. Having read the Bible, what is actually given is not story pitches, outlines or indeed any indication of an intent to produce said items... What is given are details of previous adventures in this reimagined universe from '''the 'in-universe' perspective itself''' of Borusa's scribe under Borusa's instruction. And I can find no reference in In-Vision 108 or Doctor Who: Regeneration to suggest that these would actually ever be utilised from a production standpoint. (I mean, the whole thing reads as a short story within the proposed universe rather than a production document... but that's a discussion of its own.) So, I would like to question their inclusion here. [[User:JDPManjoume|JDPManjoume]] [[User talk:JDPManjoume|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
To add to this discussion just a little... since it is about defining the scope of this page: I would like to readily note that the Leekley Bible items - bar Fathers and Brothers - would likely not fit the notion that is being laid out, given that they seem not to have actually been '''pitched at all'''. Having read the Bible, what is actually given is not story pitches, outlines or indeed any indication of an intent to produce said items... What is given are details of previous adventures in this reimagined universe from '''the 'in-universe' perspective itself''' of Borusa's scribe under Borusa's instruction. And I can find no reference in In-Vision 108 or Doctor Who: Regeneration to suggest that these would actually ever be utilised from a production standpoint. (I mean, the whole thing reads as a short story within the proposed universe rather than a production document... but that's a discussion of its own.) So, I would like to question their inclusion here. [[User:JDPManjoume|JDPManjoume]] [[User talk:JDPManjoume|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
::: Are they really? That's ''very'' intriguing. If they're in-universe, they should definitely be covered as such. Probably as {{tl|invalid}} on Rule 4 grounds, of course. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
::: Are they really? That's ''very'' intriguing. If they're in-universe, they should definitely be covered as such. Probably as {{tl|invalid}} on Rule 4 grounds, of course. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
::::And potentially Rule 3 - unless we say that it was indeed released to its intended audience of Amblin Entertainment execs? Maybe a bit of a strange interpretation there. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.