Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Production errors vs Discontinuity
(→Vote 2) |
|||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:::::I'm sure I was reading one of the articles you've been editing that there weren't any 'lighting directors' back in the day?. The italic explanation I must have left by accident. As for the error itself, yes now that I read it again it isn't an error, when I left it in I was thinking of backdrops and shadows falling on them, but now remember the shot in question and it's not an error (I shall fall back on the; 'it is the very nature of a wiki that things will be edited multiple times before they're correct and everyone makes mistakes'). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:25, March 25, 2010 (UTC) | :::::I'm sure I was reading one of the articles you've been editing that there weren't any 'lighting directors' back in the day?. The italic explanation I must have left by accident. As for the error itself, yes now that I read it again it isn't an error, when I left it in I was thinking of backdrops and shadows falling on them, but now remember the shot in question and it's not an error (I shall fall back on the; 'it is the very nature of a wiki that things will be edited multiple times before they're correct and everyone makes mistakes'). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:25, March 25, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Almost. There were no [[cinematographer]]s back in the day. There ''were'' lighting directors, though they didn't begin to be credited until [[Season 8]], and you would still find occasional stories that didn't credit people, particularly in the McCoy era. 22:04, March 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Vote 2== | ==Vote 2== | ||
(Please sign user name and place a reason why)<br> | (Please sign user name and place a reason why)<br> | ||
