Trusted
14,606
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: Now as Nahald has already mentioned, using "Queen" here ''would'' be the only reasonable means of disambiguation, and she could hardly be considered a primary topic with the existence of [[Victoria Waterfield]], hence disambiguation should be considered necessary. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | : Now as Nahald has already mentioned, using "Queen" here ''would'' be the only reasonable means of disambiguation, and she could hardly be considered a primary topic with the existence of [[Victoria Waterfield]], hence disambiguation should be considered necessary. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: There are other ''potential'' means of disambiguation, but "Queen" is the cleanest option. Technically it ''should'' be [[Victoria (Imperial Moon)]], but that's even more unintuitive than the current situation. [[User:Bwburke94|bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 12:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | :: There are other ''potential'' means of disambiguation, but "Queen" is the cleanest option. Technically it ''should'' be [[Victoria (Imperial Moon)]], but that's even more unintuitive than the current situation. [[User:Bwburke94|bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 12:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: I agree that "Queen Victoria" would be a more suitable page name, for all the reasons already mentioned. [[User:LauraBatham|LauraBatham]] [[User talk:LauraBatham|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |