Trusted
25,401
edits
User talk:BananaClownMan: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Timelines: new section
Tag: Rollback |
(→Timelines: new section) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 441: | Line 441: | ||
::: I'm glad we're in agreement! I also think underlining would make a good addition to the format. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC) | ::: I'm glad we're in agreement! I also think underlining would make a good addition to the format. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Timelines == | |||
Hi! I recently noticed your statement that you didn't agree with the addition of some stories to the timeline, although you didn't think anyone had the right to remove said stories. That's fair enough, but I think a more measured approach could be applied here. As I mentioned at [[Theory talk:Timey-wimey detector#Parody stories: a confusing double-standard|Theory talk:Timey-wimey_detector]] a while back, I think that the addition ''and'' removal of stories should be conducted on a case-by-case basis (where invalid stories are concerned). Now obviously the state of the timelines should not be determined by a single editor, but I suggest that if the consensus of timeline editors is that a story should be removed, then removed it can be! That way a single editor can't solely influence the removal of stories, but they also can't solely influence the addition of said stories. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:28, 22 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
