Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
81,877
edits
(Created page with "== Infobox image == thumb|Emily Cook interview, 2018. (Note that a page like Emily Cook does not '''''require infobox image discussion'''''.) Just wa...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There's also a second crop available on the [[:File:Emily Cook.jpg|file page]], and I could probably find the file to re-crop it. The issue I was having originally was cropping out the [[Thirteenth Doctor]], since she hadn't been revealed yet. Hence the second crop in December. I do feel an image in which she's pictured ''in relationship'' to the DWU (here discussing the new Doctor) would be better than a headshot/selfie.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 19:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC) | There's also a second crop available on the [[:File:Emily Cook.jpg|file page]], and I could probably find the file to re-crop it. The issue I was having originally was cropping out the [[Thirteenth Doctor]], since she hadn't been revealed yet. Hence the second crop in December. I do feel an image in which she's pictured ''in relationship'' to the DWU (here discussing the new Doctor) would be better than a headshot/selfie.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 19:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
: See, my instinct is quite on the contrary direction. The wiki's SEO is quite good, and a '''''lot''''' of our pages are for not-so-high-profile writers/actors/etc. This means often enough the images we choose will be the ones that pop up on Google and what-not. I feel like a headshot (or a headshot-like selfie/picture) are better suited for infoboxes than a screenshot from an interview or something like that. Obviously, if the article is large enough to accomodate it, we could and should add further images that display their relationship with the franchise. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC) |