Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,357
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Sure, FftF is weird, and I'm not even sure I agree with the ruling. My point is just that that's why I was saying "you don't have to explicitly be called a trailer to be a trailer". [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC) | Sure, FftF is weird, and I'm not even sure I agree with the ruling. My point is just that that's why I was saying "you don't have to explicitly be called a trailer to be a trailer". [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: Oh, yes, but ''my'' point was that this only goes for trailers that can be chalked up to the "Next Time"-style "footage from a later, fuller thing" kind of trailer; trailers made up of original footage are a wildly different kettle of fish, with their own jurisprudence. (And even then, ''Friend from the Future'' was only deemed an invalid trailer as an ''ad hoc'' decision at the end of a very lengthy thread!) | |||
:: Still, as I said, this is all fairly academic since I agree ''Doctor Who Comes to MINECRAFT!'' should be invalid. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 22:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC) |