3,702
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
::: Scrooge put it into far better words than I could have. It was obvious that the FP page was written to be skewed in a certain way which is why I stated that it was biased. One such example was the claim that Aristide Twain had "supplied ''trustworthy'' evidence" of certain claims about Bill Baggs then linking to a comment which was clearly intended to be humerous. Also, certain comments such as; ''"the October 2021 BBV scandal that caused everyone with decency working alongside BBV to quit"'' stray away from the neutrality that these pages should offer. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:59, 9 September 2022 (UTC) | ::: Scrooge put it into far better words than I could have. It was obvious that the FP page was written to be skewed in a certain way which is why I stated that it was biased. One such example was the claim that Aristide Twain had "supplied ''trustworthy'' evidence" of certain claims about Bill Baggs then linking to a comment which was clearly intended to be humerous. Also, certain comments such as; ''"the October 2021 BBV scandal that caused everyone with decency working alongside BBV to quit"'' stray away from the neutrality that these pages should offer. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:59, 9 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::: Also, I too think that the page should be made but shouldn't have an ''(anthology)'' or ''(unproduced story)'' tag attached to the title. The page should identify it as an in-joke/marketing campaign especially due to the fact that, as Scrooge states, another valid story poses as being a sequel to one of the stories purportedly contained inside the anthology. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
edits