Trusted
8,499
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
::Technically speaking, you should support this. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | ::Technically speaking, you should support this. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
::: The claim that I made was not a solid stance. I am simply saying that there is ''no evidence'' that the book has ever been in production - and actually there is a lot of evidence, posted in this very thread, that it was simply a hoax/joke. Therefore, as I pointed out, someone who was claiming that the book had been in production would have to satisfy the burden of proof as currently no evidence has been put forward. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | ::: The claim that I made was not a solid stance. I am simply saying that there is ''no evidence'' that the book has ever been in production - and actually there is a lot of evidence, posted in this very thread, that it was simply a hoax/joke. Therefore, as I pointed out, someone who was claiming that the book had been in production would have to satisfy the burden of proof as currently no evidence has been put forward. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::But that's not what you said, hence my point of information. If you want to amend your statement and admit you overreached I have no objections. I'm just noting, for future reference, that there's no distinction on who has a burden of proof. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |