Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,134
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::From my perspective I don't think my ask would prompt as much discussion if the forums were with us and the actual inclusion debate could happen. idk, both this and the Minecraft thing seem like obvious cases of ''prima facie'' invalidity, we stick an invalid tag on them, then discuss them in the forums. It's just that because forums ded, we can't do that last part, so nobody wants to rule something as invalid for an arbitrarily long period of time and these cursory discussions turn into pseudo inclusion debates. Which I get. But it's frustrating, since I want to do coverage of this anthology and leaving this story unresolved is going to eat at me. And, fair warning, I'm absolutely not going to give a full summary for it. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | :::From my perspective I don't think my ask would prompt as much discussion if the forums were with us and the actual inclusion debate could happen. idk, both this and the Minecraft thing seem like obvious cases of ''prima facie'' invalidity, we stick an invalid tag on them, then discuss them in the forums. It's just that because forums ded, we can't do that last part, so nobody wants to rule something as invalid for an arbitrarily long period of time and these cursory discussions turn into pseudo inclusion debates. Which I get. But it's frustrating, since I want to do coverage of this anthology and leaving this story unresolved is going to eat at me. And, fair warning, I'm absolutely not going to give a full summary for it. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: I actually did rule the ''Minecraft'' thing invalid — and I don't really think it's fair to compare something like ''that'' to a story in an an otherwise-kosher Obverse anthology! Very different burdens of proof, IMO. | |||
:: I sympathise w/regards to Wikifying the whole collection, but then, would it really be so different even if ''You Are…'' were invalid? Invalid pages still are supposed to get full coverage! That being said, I'll be happy to Wikify it myself (valid or otherwise, depending on how this discussion goes). <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 19:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |