Trusted
49,177
edits
NateBumber (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::What kind of sense does it make to block spoilers on a talk page for an article that allows spoilers? If we can't talk about a page on its talk page, we'd might as well not have one at all! Where does [[T:SPOIL]] require anything like this? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC) | ::What kind of sense does it make to block spoilers on a talk page for an article that allows spoilers? If we can't talk about a page on its talk page, we'd might as well not have one at all! Where does [[T:SPOIL]] require anything like this? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
::: Not entirely sure, but disallowing spoilers on the talk page for a spoilery page is '''1000%''' counterproductive, and regardless of whatever policy ''may or may not exist'' — and if it isn't a policy then it shouldn't be exclusively binding, as per [[T:LOCAL RULES]] — an exception ''must'' be made for this talk page under the very obvious circumstances. Otherwise, the only discussion that can be had is through edit summaries, which can lead to [[Tardis:Edit wars are good for absolutely nothing|edit wars]] which creates a million ''more'' issues than saying that Scottish-Rwandan actor's name on this talk page. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |