Trusted
8,483
edits
Talk:You are the Absurd Hero (short story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:You are the Absurd Hero (short story) (edit)
Revision as of 23:30, 18 September 2022
, 18 September 2022→Validity
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:: Also, @[[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]], @[[User:Najawin|Najawin]] was not calling ''you'' stupid, but calling a poorly thought out policy stupid: the policy does not reflect community consensus and is harming coverage of material on the Wiki. I applaud you for consistently upholding policy, but there comes a time when surely you can see the status quo is doing more harm than good. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 23:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | :: Also, @[[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]], @[[User:Najawin|Najawin]] was not calling ''you'' stupid, but calling a poorly thought out policy stupid: the policy does not reflect community consensus and is harming coverage of material on the Wiki. I applaud you for consistently upholding policy, but there comes a time when surely you can see the status quo is doing more harm than good. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 23:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::You weren't involved in the [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Forum:Decide_Your_Destiny_and_Find_Your_Fate_are_NOTDWU_from_here_on_out| discussion in question] (Or the one that [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Forum:Doctor_Who:_Worlds_in_Time| prompted it]). Indeed, very few people were. The only people that discussed the specific issue of nonlinear prose were Czech, Tangerine, and OS25 - and OS25 supported some level of inclusion! Hence why it's left such a bad taste in many people's mouth. As for upholding them, well, given that I'm arguing that this is invalid under those rules that I disagree with, I don't think that I could be attacking you personally on that front, since I'm doing '''''the exact same thing'''''. But if you prefer the phrase "fundamentally flawed and decided in error", that's fair enough and I apologize. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
