Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,198
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
After the initial slate of validations on this thread, any further validations on this basis ''would'' have to go through their own inclusion debates; but as I said, I believe a lot of the proposed inclusion debates currently engorging [[Tardis:Temporary forums#Proposed threads]] fall so straightforwardly within this proposal that they could be validated straightaway if consensus around my proposal builds. I will include an explanatory table here. If any of the examples below are controversial in ways not directly related to the heart of my proposal, they will be retracted and left off to their own threads ''after'' the proposal is enshrined into policy. (This is also why I've left out stories whose invalidity arguably rests on more than ordinary Rule 4 concerns, like ''[[The Skivers (audio skit)|The Skivers]]''.) | After the initial slate of validations on this thread, any further validations on this basis ''would'' have to go through their own inclusion debates; but as I said, I believe a lot of the proposed inclusion debates currently engorging [[Tardis:Temporary forums#Proposed threads]] fall so straightforwardly within this proposal that they could be validated straightaway if consensus around my proposal builds. I will include an explanatory table here. If any of the examples below are controversial in ways not directly related to the heart of my proposal, they will be retracted and left off to their own threads ''after'' the proposal is enshrined into policy. (This is also why I've left out stories whose invalidity arguably rests on more than ordinary Rule 4 concerns, like ''[[The Skivers (audio skit)|The Skivers]]''.) | ||
(Also of note | (Also of note: | ||
* ''[[The Curse of Fatal Death (TV story)|The Curse of Fatal Death]]'', not currently {{tlx|invalid}} but which, according to [[User:Najawin]], may have some additional evidence that would force us to invalidate again once examined under current Rule 4 policy. It is notoriously referenced as a possible future in ''[[The Tomorrow Windows (novel)|The Tomorrow Windows]]'', and its continuity regarding Tersurus is referenced in ''[[The Taking of Planet 5 (novel)|The Taking of Planet 5]]'' as a part of the mainstream DWU's history. | |||
* ''[[Vienna (series)|Vienna]]'', currently not-covered-at-all rather than covered-as-{{tlx|invalid}}, but which has the ''profile'' of an invalid source — that is, it's licensed, it stars something which started in the DWU, but we don't currently consider it a valid source. Despite questionable intent at the series' launch on whether it was in the DWU, ''[[Master! (audio series)|Master!]]'', when it brought [[Vienna Salvatori]] back to the explicit DWU, directly acknowledged its continuity. | |||
I think both's validity could also be enshrined by this proposal even if they don't quite fit the mould, but again, feel free to tell me otherwise and they can be shunted off to their own threads) | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
Line 30: | Line 35: | ||
|''[[Dimensions in Time (TV story)|Dimensions in Time]]'' | |''[[Dimensions in Time (TV story)|Dimensions in Time]]'' | ||
|''[[Rescue (short story)|Rescue]]'' | |''[[Rescue (short story)|Rescue]]'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''[[Death Comes to Time (webcast)|Death Comes to Time]]'' | |''[[Death Comes to Time (webcast)|Death Comes to Time]]'' |