Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,134
edits
User talk:Schreibenheimer: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Policy: new section) |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Hi, here is a link to a forum thread that spells out what I was trying to say in [[Thread:260549]], specifically [[User:CzechOut]]'s closing comments - [[Thread:191574]]. There are probably more so I'll keep checking thanks [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:07, December 12, 2019 (UTC) | Hi, here is a link to a forum thread that spells out what I was trying to say in [[Thread:260549]], specifically [[User:CzechOut]]'s closing comments - [[Thread:191574]]. There are probably more so I'll keep checking thanks [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:07, December 12, 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Temporary forums validity debates == | |||
Hey — this may be unorthodox, so apologies, but — I notice that you supported several proposed validity debates in the [[Tardis:Temporary forums]]. Via my now-live [[User:Scrooge_MacDuck/Sandbox_Eta|"Rule 4 by proxy"]] proposal, I hope to cut through the need for individual threads on multiple such candidates including ''Shalka'' and the Cushing movies. ''If'' my proposal seems viable to you, I think it would be productive of you not only to add your signature to that proposal, but to withdraw it from the individual inclusion debate proposals, to ensure that my wider proposal is discussed first. (If it fails, of course, you can re-add your signature to the individual inclusion debates so that they can be had independently after all.) It's up to you, though, of course. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 18:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
