Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
81,877
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/An update to T:VS: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/An update to T:VS (view source)
Revision as of 01:00, 23 January 2023
, 23 January 2023no edit summary
Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}[[Category:Temporary forums archives]] | {{retitle|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}[[Category:Temporary forums archives]] | ||
{{big toc}} | |||
== "Rule 4 by proxy": a necessary update to T:VS == | == "Rule 4 by proxy": a necessary update to T:VS == | ||
| Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
So this is one reason I agree with this suggestion. It seems rather pedantic that we have to stand around and say "Well, this is a Doctor Who story, set in a Doctor Who universe. But -- is it THE Doctor Who universe? Is it set in the same universe as ''The Long Game'' and ''Boom Town''? If not, throw it in the fire. Because it's not can- errr. Not THE Doctor Who universe!" [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) | So this is one reason I agree with this suggestion. It seems rather pedantic that we have to stand around and say "Well, this is a Doctor Who story, set in a Doctor Who universe. But -- is it THE Doctor Who universe? Is it set in the same universe as ''The Long Game'' and ''Boom Town''? If not, throw it in the fire. Because it's not can- errr. Not THE Doctor Who universe!" [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Conclusion == | |||
<div class="tech"> | <div class="tech"> | ||
It's been over a week now and it seems that a general consensus has formed in favour of this proposal. In fact, no-one is outright opposed. Therefore, in general, this proposal can be considered successful. However, there have been a few concerns that I will now address: | It's been over a week now and it seems that a general consensus has formed in favour of this proposal. In fact, no-one is outright opposed. Therefore, in general, this proposal can be considered successful. However, there have been a few concerns that I will now address: | ||
