emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::I wouldn't call it accurate to conflate "He Who Creates" with "The Form of the Good" or "Pure Actuality". It's more a neoplatonist thing, iirc? There's some subtle nuances that come about from them smuggling in some more specific assumptions that come up later in the history. I don't want to go searching through Kenny. >.> But as the article is written it's pretty explicitly Abrahamic, though the idea of a singular "God" is not Abrahamic. It just doesn't bear much relation to what's in this article. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | :::I wouldn't call it accurate to conflate "He Who Creates" with "The Form of the Good" or "Pure Actuality". It's more a neoplatonist thing, iirc? There's some subtle nuances that come about from them smuggling in some more specific assumptions that come up later in the history. I don't want to go searching through Kenny. >.> But as the article is written it's pretty explicitly Abrahamic, though the idea of a singular "God" is not Abrahamic. It just doesn't bear much relation to what's in this article. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::Don't want to get too into the weeds on this – it was just a minor point meant to defend the non-Abrahamic-centrism of Wikipedia's choice – but I think Gerson is very convincing on the relationship of Plato and Plotinus 😛 – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 19:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |