Forum:Temporary forums/Validity debate: Scream of the Shalka: Difference between revisions

:I ''think'' I support validation? I have procedural qualms with not having dissenting voices, and would really like to see the threads where Shalka was previously ruled invalid. But I have resigned myself to my quixotic quest of being the only person who thinks these things matter. Like. I strongly suspect that even with the old threads and people arguing I'd still support validity, iirc what was in those threads. (Same thing with Death Comes to Time. I distinctly remember ''that'' validity debate, and if R4bp wasn't used I really doubt the ensuing validity debate would have convinced me that it was invalid, had we brought up the old threads + people argued it was invalid.) But as a procedural matter it rubs me the wrong way. Can we leave it at that? It's a view that's gotten me attacked in previous threads, and I'd prefer to avoid that. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)