Trusted
8,495
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Overhauling image policies: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Overhauling image policies (view source)
Revision as of 21:23, 24 February 2023
, 24 February 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
::: This seems like a good idea to me. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ::: This seems like a good idea to me. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::Me as well. In my mind, pictures are pretty much always better than no pictures, as long as they have some degree of officiality. [[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ::::Me as well. In my mind, pictures are pretty much always better than no pictures, as long as they have some degree of officiality. [[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
'''Strongly''' disagree. I don't believe that out of universe reference images for things that are referred to in prose should be placed on articles. This is similar to articles where someone has placed an out of universe definition, which blatantly violates [[T:NO RW]] and I constantly find violations of that I have to remove. We do not know that something looks the same in-universe as it does out of universe. It's a violation of [[T:NO RW]] to suggest otherwise. Strongly, strongly oppose. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
