885
edits
Talk:Time lock: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Fixed points in time: new section
(YAY FOR DISCUSSION.) |
(→Fixed points in time: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There was more I was going to say, but I must leave. [[User:Rorybob|Rorybob]] 12:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | There was more I was going to say, but I must leave. [[User:Rorybob|Rorybob]] 12:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Fixed points in time == | |||
The sentence about fixed points in time hasn't made any sense since [http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=Time-lock&diff=prev&oldid=300943 this edit], even though it's subsequently been edited a bunch of times. I think I've edited it into what people were trying to say. | |||
However, I'm not sure how it's relevant in the first place. | |||
Before these changes, it was speculation that the concept of a time-lock was in some unspecified way related to the concept of a fixed point in time. (I think that speculation is based on Jack one being described as time-locked, and once as a fixed point in time, but I'm not sure, and the article never makes that connection.) | |||
After the changes, it doesn't even say that; it just describes fixed points in time, without giving any indication that they might have anything to do with being time-locked. | |||
And honestly, I don't think the two concepts do have anything to do with each other (beyond being timey-wimey plot devices that RTD came up with to avoid explaining complicated things where the answer would just bore people, if he even had one). A separate article on fixed points in time might make sense, but I don't think it belongs here. | |||
However, this was added back in July 2008, and subsequently edited by a lot of people who are major contributors to the site, so I'm not entirely sure about removing it without waiting for someone to comment. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 11:40, May 6, 2010 (UTC) | |||
