emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Talk:Thirteenth Doctor's forced regeneration: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:Thirteenth Doctor's forced regeneration (edit)
Revision as of 16:33, 16 March 2023
, 16 March 2023no edit summary
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (quick edit for clarity) |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::As for Nate's approach, I mean, ''sure'', but that's not really been an tack taken before. (Though obviously the discussion ''does'' have a reason for happening here, namely, the prior discussion at [[Talk:The Master/Archive 8]], where people assent to this page's existence insofar as it's relitigated after the master split.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | ::As for Nate's approach, I mean, ''sure'', but that's not really been an tack taken before. (Though obviously the discussion ''does'' have a reason for happening here, namely, the prior discussion at [[Talk:The Master/Archive 8]], where people assent to this page's existence insofar as it's relitigated after the master split.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::Sure, two people mentioned such a clause, which no one else echoed or affirmed. It strikes me as supremely odd, since (a) the debate was about whether or not to create [[The Master-Doctor]], (b) the conclusion was that no Master-Doctor page should be created, and yet (c) those who demanded that the debate be reopened, and have here moved to reopen it, were ''against'' [[The Master-Doctor]]! Given the ''absolutely vile'' denigratory rhetoric which accompanied that discussion both on- and off-wiki, personally I have subzero interest in seeing it resumed; while in the end I think it has no bearing on the viability of either | :::Sure, two people mentioned such a clause, which no one else echoed or affirmed. It strikes me as supremely odd, since (a) the debate was about whether or not to create [[The Master-Doctor]], (b) the conclusion was that no Master-Doctor page should be created, and yet (c) those who demanded that the debate be reopened, and have here moved to reopen it, were ''against'' [[The Master-Doctor]]! Given the ''absolutely vile'' denigratory rhetoric which accompanied that discussion both on- and off-wiki, personally I have subzero interest in seeing it resumed; while in the end I think it has no bearing on the viability of either page in question, since you mention [[T:MERGE]]'s recent codification of the "continuity of consciousness" rule of thumb as the be-all end-all condition of merger decisions, I move that we further postpone the relitigation until after that imposition of an arbitrary metaphysics of identity has been revisited in the forums – or, failing that, indefinitely. [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 16:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
