Trusted
34,029
edits
User:OttselSpy25/Commercial fiction sandbox: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:OttselSpy25/Commercial fiction sandbox (edit)
Revision as of 20:39, 18 March 2023
, 18 March 2023→Stories I'm less certain about
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* [[The Trip of a Lifetime (trailer)|The Trip of a Lifetime]] and similar trailers, leaning towards valid. No different from Twelve narrating about the [[Bootstrap paradox]]. However, I think these specifically would need their own debate, as the "Rule 4ness" of these is obviously debatable. | * [[The Trip of a Lifetime (trailer)|The Trip of a Lifetime]] and similar trailers, leaning towards valid. No different from Twelve narrating about the [[Bootstrap paradox]]. However, I think these specifically would need their own debate, as the "Rule 4ness" of these is obviously debatable. | ||
* [[Famine Appeal]] - I'm leaning towards non-valid for things like this, but I would have to hear from my peers. | * [[Famine Appeal]] - I'm leaning towards non-valid for things like this, but I would have to hear from my peers. | ||
* [[Friend from the Future (TV story)|Friend from the Future]] - I can say with certainty that this should be valid, | * [[Friend from the Future (TV story)|Friend from the Future]] - I can say with certainty that this should be valid, as [[Steven Moffat]] intended. However, because it was invalidated originally for more than one reason, and because it is contentious, this will need its own debate. | ||
* [[Meet the Thirteenth Doctor (TV story)|Meet the Thirteenth Doctor]] - This one is odd, because I don't think it qualifies for Rule 4. Now, if a future story were to give context to what's going on here, I think this would qualify for ''Rule 4 By Proxy''. | * [[Meet the Thirteenth Doctor (TV story)|Meet the Thirteenth Doctor]] - This one is odd, because I don't think it qualifies for Rule 4. Now, if a future story were to give context to what's going on here, I think this would qualify for ''Rule 4 By Proxy''. | ||
* [[Doctor Who: 50 Years (trailer)]] - Another great example here where there's no real proof that this was intended to be set inside the ''DWU''. But you could also argue that this trailer simply depicts a [[Multi-Doctor Event]] that ''Day'' doesn't show. It's certainly more of a promotional short than a trailer, and certainly something that would qualify for ''Rule 4 by Proxy'' if some other valid fiction referenced it. But as it stands, I think it deserves to be in the middle here. | * [[Doctor Who: 50 Years (trailer)]] - Another great example here where there's no real proof that this was intended to be set inside the ''DWU''. But you could also argue that this trailer simply depicts a [[Multi-Doctor Event]] that ''Day'' doesn't show. It's certainly more of a promotional short than a trailer, and certainly something that would qualify for ''Rule 4 by Proxy'' if some other valid fiction referenced it. But as it stands, I think it deserves to be in the middle here. | ||
