Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,207
edits
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
: I haven't forgotten about this discussion, just been momentarily stunned into silence by your slight against Leibniz… | : I haven't forgotten about this discussion, just been momentarily stunned into silence by your slight against Leibniz… | ||
: Anyway, still brewing on an alternative dab term, but I did spot another motivating factor for renaming [[God (mythology)]] in particular: in contexts where the word "mythology" is used, the word is usually spelled lowercase-g god, which instead we cover at [[God]]. I'd suggest we switch the titles if it wouldn't be such a pain for linking. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 21:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | : Anyway, still brewing on an alternative dab term, but I did spot another motivating factor for renaming [[God (mythology)]] in particular: in contexts where the word "mythology" is used, the word is usually spelled lowercase-g god, which instead we cover at [[God]]. I'd suggest we switch the titles if it wouldn't be such a pain for linking. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 21:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: That would be ''wholly'' improper. The class of being should certainly be the primary topic, not the one entity belonging to it who is referred solely by that class. That goes double with the fact that there are many more instances of "gods" in DWU media than of God (and more evidence for their in-universe reality!). I still feel that if consensus turns against "(mythology)" in this case, [[God (individual)]] would be the most sensible option. Indeed, [https://jennyeverywhere.fandom.com/wiki/God_(individual) it's what I elected to use on the ''Jenny Everywhere'' Wiki]. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 21:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC) |