Forum:Temporary forums/Relaxing the past-tense requirement: Difference between revisions

Forum:Temporary forums/Relaxing the past-tense requirement (view source)

489 bytes added , 6 April 2023

no edit summary

1,858

edits

Revision as of 19:25, 6 April 2023 (view source) Pluto2 (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Discussion) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:44, 6 April 2023 (view source) Cousin Ettolrhc (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit Newer edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:I '''support''' all of these proposals, although I agree with Jack that for articles like [[Earth]] we should stick to past tense. [[User:Pluto2\|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2\|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)		:I '''support''' all of these proposals, although I agree with Jack that for articles like [[Earth]] we should stick to past tense. [[User:Pluto2\|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2\|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


			I '''support''' allowing present tense in real-world pages, and requiring future-tense on "future releases" pages. However, I feel the "ledes" section is incredibly major and not really within the scope of this thread, and for that reason I think we should wait for thread on "RW-POV ledes" to allow the extra nuance that they can be in present tense. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc\|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)