User:OttselSpy25/First TW appearance infobox variables: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Undo revision 3478934 by OttselSpy25 (talk)
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
(Undo revision 3478934 by OttselSpy25 (talk))
Line 8: Line 8:
|firstNOCOV  = w:c:disney:Steamboat Willie{{!}}Disney Cartoons: Steamboat Willie
|firstNOCOV  = w:c:disney:Steamboat Willie{{!}}Disney Cartoons: Steamboat Willie
|first      = Disney Time 1975 (TV story)
|first      = Disney Time 1975 (TV story)
|firstVALID = The Incredible Doctor Who History Tour (No. 7.) (comic story){{!}}The Incredible Doctor Who History Tour (No. 7.)
|firstVALID = The Incredible Doctor Who History Tour (No. 7.)
|main actor  =  
|main actor  =  
}}{{Infobox off-wiki first
}}{{Infobox off-wiki first
Line 98: Line 98:


If we say, for Zog, first non-valid appearance=''the stage play'', first appearance= ''random short trips story''... The second variable is still telling a non-truth. But if we say ''first appearance=stage play'', ''first valid source appearance= random short trips story'', then that's at least saying two statements which are factually true.
If we say, for Zog, first non-valid appearance=''the stage play'', first appearance= ''random short trips story''... The second variable is still telling a non-truth. But if we say ''first appearance=stage play'', ''first valid source appearance= random short trips story'', then that's at least saying two statements which are factually true.
Just as an example, I've gone ahead and added firstVALID= as an input to my test template mentioned before. Then I've added Zog to this section to show the idea. On some rare occasions, we might very well see the non-covered, first, and valid inputs all used!


The more that I look at everything in this forum, the more I can see that I'm a little bit over my head with this one, and if this concept takes any shape I suspect it'll look totally different from what I've pitched. But I think this is a general good first step in trying to give a more useful and honest guide to our readers.
The more that I look at everything in this forum, the more I can see that I'm a little bit over my head with this one, and if this concept takes any shape I suspect it'll look totally different from what I've pitched. But I think this is a general good first step in trying to give a more useful and honest guide to our readers.
Trusted
34,029

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.