11,491
edits
User talk:Freddie R. Aldous: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
added ' "This isn't notable" - why?'
(→Dr vs Dr.: new section) Tag: 2017 source edit |
(added ' "This isn't notable" - why?') Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 419: | Line 419: | ||
If I haven't explained it very well, it's explained on [[T:HONOURIFICS]]. [[User:Jack "BtR" Saxon|Jack "BtR" Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack "BtR" Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC) | If I haven't explained it very well, it's explained on [[T:HONOURIFICS]]. [[User:Jack "BtR" Saxon|Jack "BtR" Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack "BtR" Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
== "This isn't notable" — why? == | |||
Hi Jack "BtR" Saxon, | |||
In my recent edits for TARDIS Data Core, whenever I have mentioned in 'Behind the scenes' that a character has never been identified with a first name or surname on-screen or in any spin-off media, you have always reverted these with the explanation "This isn't notable". | |||
Please could you explain why the aforementioned "isn't notable"? If this goes against the rules of TARDIS Data Core, I apologize. I always do my best to make good edits and understand if for some reason an admin has to reverse them. | |||
I await your reply with great interest. -- [[User:Freddie R. Aldous|Freddie R. Aldous]] | |||
