Trusted
34,029
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Relaxing the past-tense requirement: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Relaxing the past-tense requirement (view source)
Revision as of 20:05, 23 April 2023
, 23 April 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
:::I also agree with [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]] that we do not need more templates, and that limiting to a few sentences would force us to focus on only one element like their performance in the Jo Grant example above. Which would go against our [[T:VS]] of not counting one story / medium above another. | :::I also agree with [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]] that we do not need more templates, and that limiting to a few sentences would force us to focus on only one element like their performance in the Jo Grant example above. Which would go against our [[T:VS]] of not counting one story / medium above another. | ||
:::I agree that [[T:OOU]] needs some re-writing to emphasise how to write an article in the past tense without implying their demise. —[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 04:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC) | :::I agree that [[T:OOU]] needs some re-writing to emphasise how to write an article in the past tense without implying their demise. —[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 04:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: Popping in to say that, the more that I think about it, I think I'm currently only in favor of relaxing the past-tense requirement on entirely OOU pages and sections. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
