User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-6032121-20181031153320/@comment-1432718-20181102025103: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-6032121-20181031153320/@comment-1432718-20181102025103'''
OK, I found three different places that explain where we're coming from with regards to charity works, and there is a bit of repetition, but I'll list them here for anyone who wants to see the details.
OK, I found three different places that explain where we're coming from with regards to charity works, and there is a bit of repetition, but I'll list them here for anyone who wants to see the details.


Line 9: Line 8:


As for the OP's question in the third paragraph, I believe in those cases there wasn't the full copyright given, similar to the Iris cases. I'd like to know if there are examples on this wiki of charity publications that had full licensing given.
As for the OP's question in the third paragraph, I believe in those cases there wasn't the full copyright given, similar to the Iris cases. I'd like to know if there are examples on this wiki of charity publications that had full licensing given.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Help!/20181031153320-6032121/20181102025103-1432718]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.