229,566
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20190809230951/@comment-6032121-20190810204708: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20190809230951/@comment-6032121-20190810204708 (edit)
Revision as of 13:27, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
According to the page itself, I get the impression that the books consisted of short stories packaged together with some additional info on the topic being featured. As the summaries present on all of the short stories' individual pages show, ''these'' are clearly narrative as anything. See ''[[Stamp of Approval (short story)]]'', for example. | According to the page itself, I get the impression that the books consisted of short stories packaged together with some additional info on the topic being featured. As the summaries present on all of the short stories' individual pages show, ''these'' are clearly narrative as anything. See ''[[Stamp of Approval (short story)]]'', for example. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
(All that being said, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but there ''are''also circumstances where a story has an encyclopedic format yet is still considered valid by the Wiki. ''[[The Book of the War (novel)]]'', say. Where exactly Tardis draws the line is something I'd quite like to know myself, but there ''are'' objectively encyclopedias that fall on the right side of it.) | (All that being said, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but there ''are''also circumstances where a story has an encyclopedic format yet is still considered valid by the Wiki. ''[[The Book of the War (novel)]]'', say. Where exactly Tardis draws the line is something I'd quite like to know myself, but there ''are'' objectively encyclopedias that fall on the right side of it.) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190809230951-1432718/20190810204708-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
