229,566
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-45692830-20200811193727: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-45692830-20200811193727 (edit)
Revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sure. I used reference book as an example. The reasoning here actually seems to suggest that this isn't the case, but, again, I'm not exactly suspecting that this wiki is 100% consistent over a period of seven years (especially not over rule 1, which I think we can all agree is an absolute mess of a rule). I just brought up the immediate precedent I remembered. | Sure. I used reference book as an example. The reasoning here actually seems to suggest that this isn't the case, but, again, I'm not exactly suspecting that this wiki is 100% consistent over a period of seven years (especially not over rule 1, which I think we can all agree is an absolute mess of a rule). I just brought up the immediate precedent I remembered. | ||
If there's more recent precedent, or more applicable precedent, I'm all for it. | If there's more recent precedent, or more applicable precedent, I'm all for it. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200811174238-1678571/20200811193727-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
