228,854
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20191002114550/@comment-1783865-20191002141127: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20191002114550/@comment-1783865-20191002141127 (edit)
Revision as of 13:41, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
At the old one Shambala said when we know if the production has proper licensing from the BBC it can be reopened. I think, but I'm not sure, that the trailer being put out by the Doctor Who YouTube channel concludes this. BTW, I don't think it does violate. Millions of times you people have said if it's about something already released (which Mission to the Unknown is, this just being a remake) then there is no violation. | At the old one Shambala said when we know if the production has proper licensing from the BBC it can be reopened. I think, but I'm not sure, that the trailer being put out by the Doctor Who YouTube channel concludes this. BTW, I don't think it does violate. Millions of times you people have said if it's about something already released (which Mission to the Unknown is, this just being a remake) then there is no violation. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191002114550-1783865/20191002141127-1783865]]</noinclude> | ||
