User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170423154116: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170423154116'''
So is anyone currently apposed to ''FftF'' being valid? More specifically, does anyone disagree with any of the recent points brought up?
So is anyone currently apposed to ''FftF'' being valid? More specifically, does anyone disagree with any of the recent points brought up?


Not trying to suggest anything, just trying to legitimately understand the current atmosphere of this debate.
Not trying to suggest anything, just trying to legitimately understand the current atmosphere of this debate.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170423154116-4028641]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
214,430

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.