User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-20607870-20160109200404: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-20607870-20160109200404'''
I don't want to sound rude SOTO but when I and Ringoroadagain say non canon or canon we mean what you mean to be Invalid and Valid. I feel like what the BBC establish as non-canon is invalid and what's left is canon which is valid. I hope we don't fall out over this. But we mean no harm.
I don't want to sound rude SOTO but when I and Ringoroadagain say non canon or canon we mean what you mean to be Invalid and Valid. I feel like what the BBC establish as non-canon is invalid and what's left is canon which is valid. I hope we don't fall out over this. But we mean no harm.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20160109192541-27343779/20160109200404-20607870]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.